## Company Profile SCHENKER + CO AG (DB Schenker Austria) — national/region arm of DB Schenker focused on forwarding & contract logistics. Bernd Labugger is VP Ocean Freight South East Europe (GPIS Cluster Austria & Southeast Europe). Core services: ocean & air freight forwarding, land transport, rail corridors to Adriatic ports (Koper/Trieste), project logistics and customs. Market position: leading international forwarder in Austria with strong connections into Adriatic gateways that serve Austrian importers/exporters; handles industrial, retail and temperature-sensitive/agricultural flows for Central & Southeast European markets. Scale: part of Deutsche Bahn/DB Schenker global network with extensive ocean carrier contracts and rail link expertise (regional leader rather than a niche player). Evidence: internal contact list memo from DB Schenker (project logistics contacts). ## Pain Points 1) Persistent Asia–Europe routing disruption (Red Sea diversions) → clients facing +10–14 day transit times, higher fuel/war‑risk surcharges and pressure to raise safety stocks. Schenker needs a way to help clients reduce exposure (origin diversification, alternative suppliers) without re‑architecting customers’ procurement processes. 2) Thinning of mainline calls into Adriatic ports and greater feedering → more transshipments, higher terminal dwell and rail slot congestion to/from Koper/Trieste. That causes missed connections, ad‑hoc trucking and client service failures. Schenker’s ocean product must be complemented by faster supplier/market alternatives to keep cargo flow and avoid costly exceptions. 3) Customers (especially agri/perishables and price‑sensitive importers) need verified, contract‑ready suppliers and quick trade execution (product specs, compliance, payment terms). Schenker can move logistics but lacks a lightweight channel to originate and qualify exporters/importers at scale — Tridge Ark provides that capability. ## Intel Summary === MULTI-DIMENSION RESEARCH === === 1. [MARKET EVENTS] Southeast Europe ocean freight, Adriatic ports & impact on Austrian shippers (2026) === **Role of Adriatic ports for Austria (Trieste, Koper, Ploče)** - The North Adriatic ports (Trieste, Koper, Rijeka, Venice, Ploče) are the natural maritime gateway for Central & Southeast Europe, including Austria, Hungary, Slovakia, Czechia and southern Germany. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adriatic_Sea?utm_source=openai)) - Koper is currently the **largest container terminal in the Adriatic**, with total throughput of **20.8 million tonnes and ~998,000 TEU in 2021**, and **1.13 million TEU in 2024**. A majority of its volume is hinterland transit traffic to Austria, Hungary, Slovakia, Czech Republic, southern Germany and northern Italy. ([northadriaticports.com](https://northadriaticports.com/services/port-of-koper/?utm_source=openai)) - Austria alone has historically accounted for about **25% of Koper’s throughput (3.5 million tonnes)** and has been the **top transit customer** by volume. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Koper?utm_source=openai)) **Trieste & Koper as competitive alternatives to North Range ports** - The Port of Koper markets its location as giving **shorter inland distances** (by rail/road) versus North Sea ports for shippers in **Austria, Hungary, Slovakia, Czech Republic, southern Germany**. Total landed cost can be lower even if pure ocean freight is slightly higher. ([icontainers.com](https://www.icontainers.com/ports/koper/?utm_source=openai)) - Trieste and Koper both offer frequent deep-sea services to Asia and the Mediterranean; combined with upgraded rail corridors to Austria (via the Alps) they support competitive **transit times to Central Europe vs Rotterdam/Hamburg** for many flows from Asia. (Inference based on geography and cited hinterland focus). ([northadriaticports.com](https://northadriaticports.com/services/port-of-koper/?utm_source=openai)) **Recent and near-term volume dynamics (2024–2026)** Direct 2026 TEU forecasts for Trieste/Koper/Ploče are scarce in public sources, but several near-term signals are relevant: - Koper’s container growth: public stats indicate container throughput increasing to **1.13 million TEU in 2024**, continuing a trend of steady growth from under 1.0m TEU in 2021. This reinforces Koper’s role as a growing Adriatic entry point for Austria and neighbouring markets. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Koper?utm_source=openai)) - The **Red Sea crisis and Cape rerouting** (see section 2) have cut some Asia–Europe sailings and stretched round-voyage times by 10–14 days. This effectively “uses up” vessel capacity and forces carriers to rationalise port calls. Secondary gateways, including some Adriatic ports, risk fewer direct mainline calls but may gain **feeder/transshipment** volumes. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Because **Austrian cargo is strongly rail-linked** to Koper and Trieste, any reduction in direct Asia–Adriatic loops may shift flows toward **feeder via Mediterranean hubs** (Piraeus, Gioia Tauro) or even back to **North Range ports** when schedule reliability via the Med weakens. This is reflected in recent advisory content suggesting that shippers should compare “total landed cost” and reliability rather than just base ocean rates when choosing Koper versus northern ports. ([icontainers.com](https://www.icontainers.com/ports/koper/?utm_source=openai)) **Implications for Austrian shippers in 2026** 1. **Routing competition: Adriatic vs North Range** - Cape detours and schedule disruptions on Asia–Europe have reduced available capacity and increased rate volatility. Carriers consolidate services into fewer ports; coastal Med hubs (Piraeus, Valencia, Algeciras) are often prioritised over smaller Adriatic calls for long-haul mainline ships. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) - For Austrian importers/exporters, this raises the likelihood of: - More **hub-and-spoke routings**: Asia → Med hub → feeder to Koper/Trieste, adding 2–5 days vs former direct calls. - For time‑sensitive cargo, a tactical shift back to **Rotterdam/Hamburg/Bremerhaven** plus longer inland legs, especially when mainline coverage of Adriatic ports is thinned. 2. **Rail corridor utilisation & congestion risk** - With Adriatic ports still targeting Central Europe, rail corridors to Austria remain strategic. Any **further re‑routing from Red Sea to Cape** in 2026 tightens vessel supply and can cause **“bunching” of arrivals**, straining rail slots and increasing terminal dwell times during peaks. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Austrian shippers may see: - Higher **pre‑carriage/on‑carriage rail rates** and stricter booking windows. - More frequent need for **truck supplements** for urgent cargo when rail slots are full. 3. **Risk profile & diversification** - Industry commentary emphasises that the Red Sea–Cape disruption is accelerating **regional diversification** and more use of multiple gateways for resilience. ([marketsnxt.com](https://marketsnxt.com/blog/shipping-cost-shock-red-sea-port-congestion-global-trade-2026/?utm_source=openai)) - Austrian shippers using Koper/Trieste/Ploče are increasingly advised to: - Maintain **dual-port or dual-gateway strategies** (Adriatic + North Range or Adriatic + Black Sea). - Consider alternative routes for Asian sourcing such as **rail (China–Europe rail), sea–air via Gulf hubs**, or US West Coast routings for some flows. ([suaidglobal.com](https://suaidglobal.com/insights/red-sea-shipping-crisis-2026/?utm_source=openai)) *Net effect for 2026:* Adriatic ports remain core for Austria’s maritime trade, but **volumes and service patterns are more volatile** than pre‑2023. Expect **more feedering, longer average transit times, and higher inland logistics complexity** for shippers depending heavily on Trieste/Koper, especially for Asia–origin cargo. **Sources (Dimension 1)** ([icontainers.com](https://www.icontainers.com/ports/koper/?utm_source=openai)) === 2. [TIMING SIGNALS] Red Sea Houthi attacks & Asia–Europe rerouting costs/delays (2026) === **Current situation & timing (as of Q1–Q2 2026)** - Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Bab el‑Mandeb began in **late 2023**, reducing Red Sea traffic and forcing widespread diversions around the Cape of Good Hope. ([eia.gov](https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61363&utm_source=openai)) - Over two years later, as of **February–April 2026**, instability continues. Analysis notes that the industry is “still navigating one of the most consequential trade disruptions in modern history,” with Red Sea traffic down roughly **60%** and container traffic through Suez down about **75% in 2024 vs 2023**. ([cxtms.com](https://cxtms.com/blog/red-sea-disruptions-shipping-routes-rates-impact-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Some carriers experimented with partial returns to Suez in early 2026 as attacks briefly moderated, but renewed military escalation and attacks in Q1 2026 have “shattered hopes of a large‑scale return of container shipping to the Red Sea in 2026.” ([cxtms.com](https://cxtms.com/blog/2026-04-30-red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-routing-costs-2026?utm_source=openai)) **Transit time impact** - Detours around the Cape add on average **+10–14 days** to Asia–North Europe and Asia–Med sailings, depending on rotation. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Some shipper‑facing advisories in April 2026 cite **10–20 day delays** for Asia–Europe containers, particularly when port congestion or missed connections are factored in. ([freightamigo.com](https://www.freightamigo.com/en/blog/logistics/the-red-sea-crisis-impacts-on-freight-rates-shipping-delays-and-global-routes/?utm_source=openai)) - These extra sailing days require additional vessels to maintain weekly loops and **disrupt schedule reliability** across all East–West trades that previously used Suez. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) **Cost impact (freight & surcharges)** - Rerouting via the Cape adds **3,500–4,500 nautical miles per round trip**, substantially increasing bunker fuel consumption and operating costs. ([marketsnxt.com](https://marketsnxt.com/blog/shipping-cost-shock-red-sea-port-congestion-global-trade-2026/?utm_source=openai)) - A recent analysis describes the “$1 million Cape detour”: incremental costs per loaded round‑trip for a large Asia–Europe container ship can approach **USD 1m** once extra fuel, charter time, and insurance are included (exact figures depend on vessel size and bunker/charter markets). ([cxtms.com](https://cxtms.com/blog/2026-04-30-red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-routing-costs-2026?utm_source=openai)) - War‑risk insurance for transiting the Red Sea/Suez has risen dramatically. Forwarders note **war‑risk premiums of 0.5–1.0% of cargo value** for vessels taking the Suez route during higher‑risk periods. ([suaidglobal.com](https://suaidglobal.com/insights/red-sea-shipping-crisis-2026/?utm_source=openai)) - Shipper‑facing commentary in April–May 2026 emphasises: - Higher **all‑in Asia–Europe spot and contract rates** vs a no‑crisis baseline. - Additional **Emergency Risk Surcharges, Contingency Surcharges or Red Sea Surcharges** layered on top of base freight. (Exact lane‑by‑lane surcharge levels vary by carrier and week; carriers rarely publish a unified number.) **Capacity & rate leverage timing signals** - Industry analysts at S&P Global in March 2026 note that: - The Middle East conflict is a **meaningful but not “pandemic‑scale”** shock for container shipping. - Continued diversions have **prevented global overcapacity** from fully depressing rates, thereby maintaining some **carrier pricing power** on Asia–Europe and Asia–US East Coast routes into **H2 2026**, contrary to importer expectations of a quick Suez normalisation. ([spglobal.com](https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2026/03/middle-east-war-impacts-container-shipping?utm_source=openai)) - A CXTMS analysis (Feb 2026) highlights: - The Red Sea crisis has forced companies to increase safety stocks by **15–25%** for goods sourced via affected lanes. - This reflects an expectation of **persistent schedule volatility** and delayed lead times through at least **late 2026**. ([cxtms.com](https://cxtms.com/blog/red-sea-disruptions-shipping-routes-rates-impact-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Broader commentary sees the 2023–2026 “shipping cost shock” as accelerating: - Long‑term **network redesign** (nearshoring, multi‑gateway strategies). - Greater **digitalisation and visibility**. - More permanent incorporation of **geopolitical risk** into freight procurement and inventory policy. ([marketsnxt.com](https://marketsnxt.com/blog/shipping-cost-shock-red-sea-port-congestion-global-trade-2026/?utm_source=openai)) **Key timing takeaway for 2026 planning** - As of **Q2 2026**, baseline expectations across industry analyses are that: - **Full normalisation of Suez transit is unlikely in 2026**; partial, stop‑start usage will continue depending on security and military developments. - Shippers should plan 2026 budgets assuming: - **10–14 additional transit days** vs pre‑crisis Asia–Europe lead times on Cape‑based routings. - **Elevated freight and surcharge levels** relative to a no‑crisis scenario, even though spot rates are far below 2021 peaks. - Continued **schedule unreliability**, especially for port pairs dependent on Suez. **Sources (Dimension 2)** ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) === 3. [DEMAND SIGNALS] Container freight rates & reliability on Europe–Asia (Q1–Q2 2026) === **Spot rate levels & trends (early 2026)** Public indices report global benchmarks; Europe–Asia Westbound is typically proxied by Asia–North Europe/Med lanes: - Drewry’s World Container Index (WCI) for **26 February 2026** shows: - Composite index at **USD 1,899/FEU**, down 1% and declining for seven consecutive weeks. - **Shanghai–Rotterdam** (Asia→North Europe) at **USD 2,094/FEU**, down 1% week‑on‑week. - **Shanghai–Genoa** (Asia→Med) at **USD 2,826/FEU**, down 2% week‑on‑week. ([drewry.co.uk](https://www.drewry.co.uk/wci?utm_source=openai)) - These levels are: - **Far below the 2021–2022 peaks**, but - Generally **above pre‑COVID 2019 levels** for comparable lanes (inference from Drewry’s historical WCI pattern). - Red Sea disruption initially pushed spot rates sharply higher in late 2023/early 2024, but by early 2026: - Additional capacity deliveries (newbuild megaships) and demand normalisation have **capped rate spikes**, leading to a “high‑floor, but not extreme” rate environment. ([spglobal.com](https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2026/03/middle-east-war-impacts-container-shipping?utm_source=openai)) **Q1 vs Q2 2026 directional signals** - From January–February 2026, WCI data shows a **gradual easing of Asia–Europe spot rates**, despite continued Red Sea disruption, indicating: - Carriers are balancing Cape detours with blank sailings and network re‑design to avoid a rate collapse but cannot fully sustain early‑2024 crisis premiums. - Shipper bargaining power is improving modestly for **Q2 2026 contract negotiations**, particularly for high‑volume BCOs. ([drewry.co.uk](https://www.drewry.co.uk/wci?utm_source=openai)) - Market commentaries in Q1–Q2 2026 nonetheless warn that: - Renewed military escalation or concentrated port congestion could trigger **short‑term rate spikes**, especially on tight corridors (Asia–Med, Asia–US East Coast). ([cxtms.com](https://cxtms.com/blog/2026-04-30-red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-routing-costs-2026?utm_source=openai)) **Capacity & utilisation** - The Cape rerouting adds roughly **10–14 days** to round voyages, which: - Effectively reduces **usable TEU capacity** on East–West strings by **mid‑teens percent** (industry rule‑of‑thumb; not a specific quoted number) because each loop requires more time and/or extra vessels. - Helps absorb part of the **“newbuild wave”** delivered 2023–2026, preventing severe overcapacity and very low rates. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Analysts argue that, absent the Red Sea crisis, Asia–Europe spot rates in early 2026 would likely be significantly lower given the size of the orderbook. (Inference based on S&P Global and other commentary about the war mitigating overcapacity). ([spglobal.com](https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2026/03/middle-east-war-impacts-container-shipping?utm_source=openai)) **Schedule reliability & delays (2026)** - Red Sea diversions have broadly: - Increased **average transit times Asia–Europe by 10–14 days**, with some lanes experiencing **10–20 day** end‑to‑end delays including missed transshipments and congestion. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Reduced schedule reliability across all affected strings; carriers struggle to keep weekly windows, and port “bunching” is common. ([ports.marinelink.com](https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)) - Shipper‑facing analyses in 2026 highlight that: - Many Asia–Europe services are operating on **extended transit timetables** that have effectively become the “new normal” schedules. - Companies are adapting by increasing **safety stock 15–25%** and lengthening planning horizons for orders reliant on Asia–Europe ocean freight. ([cxtms.com](https://cxtms.com/blog/red-sea-disruptions-shipping-routes-rates-impact-2026?utm_source=openai)) **Demand behaviour signals** - The 2023–2026 period is described as a **“shipping cost shock”** which, while no longer at pandemic‑level rates, has encouraged: - Structural **nearshoring and regionalisation** (e.g., more sourcing from Europe, North Africa, Türkiye for EU markets). - Greater use of **alternative modes/routes**: rail (China–Europe), sea‑air via Dubai/Singapore, and trans‑Pacific routings with inland US/European legs for some supply chains. ([suaidglobal.com](https://suaidglobal.com/insights/red-sea-shipping-crisis-2026/?utm_source=openai)) - For pure Europe–Asia ocean demand: - Volume growth is modest and tied closely to macro demand, but not collapsing. - The combination of **still‑elevated rates, longer lead times, and uncertainty** is suppressing some discretionary and marginal trade flows, especially low‑margin, bulky goods highly sensitive to freight cost as a share of value. *Net freight‑market signal for 2026:* - **Spot rates on Asia–Europe (proxy for Europe–Asia Westbound) in Q1 2026 are in the USD 2,000–2,800/FEU band** depending on lane (North Europe vs Med), trending **slightly down into Q2** but remaining above pre‑COVID norms. - **Schedule reliability remains structurally weaker**, and shippers are compensating with higher inventory, more diversified routings, and multi‑gateway strategies rather than expecting a quick reversion to 2019‑style conditions. **Sources (Dimension 3)** ([drewry.co.uk](https://www.drewry.co.uk/wci?utm_source=openai)) Sources: • Adriatic Sea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adriatic_Sea?utm_source=openai • Port of Koper - NAPA https://northadriaticports.com/services/port-of-koper/?utm_source=openai • Port of Koper https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Koper?utm_source=openai • Port of Koper | Ocean Freight & Container Shipping https://www.icontainers.com/ports/koper/?utm_source=openai • Port of Koper - NAPA https://northadriaticports.com/services/port-of-koper/?utm_source=openai • Port of Koper https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Koper?utm_source=openai • Port of Koper | Ocean Freight & Container Shipping https://www.icontainers.com/ports/koper/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • Port of Koper | Ocean Freight & Container Shipping https://www.icontainers.com/ports/koper/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • Shipping Cost Shock — Red Sea and Port Congestion 2026 - Markets NXT https://marketsnxt.com/blog/shipping-cost-shock-red-sea-port-congestion-global-trade-2026/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Routing Costs in 2026: The $1 Million Cape Detour | CXTMS https://cxtms.com/blog/2026-04-30-red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-routing-costs-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis 2026: Rates, Reroute… | Suaid Global https://suaidglobal.com/insights/red-sea-shipping-crisis-2026/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea attacks increase shipping times and freight rates - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61363&utm_source=openai • Red Sea Disruptions Continue: How Ongoing Instability Is Reshaping Global Shipping Routes and Rates in 2026 | CXTMS https://cxtms.com/blog/red-sea-disruptions-shipping-routes-rates-impact-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Routing Costs in 2026: The $1 Million Cape Detour | CXTMS https://cxtms.com/blog/2026-04-30-red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-routing-costs-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news/red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Disruptions Continue: How Ongoing Instability Is Reshaping Global Shipping Routes and Rates in 2026 | CXTMS https://cxtms.com/blog/red-sea-disruptions-shipping-routes-rates-impact-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis 2026: Rates, Reroute… | Suaid Global https://suaidglobal.com/insights/red-sea-shipping-crisis-2026/?utm_source=openai • Drewry - Service Expertise - World Container Index - 26 Feb https://www.drewry.co.uk/wci?utm_source=openai • TPM26: War a problem for container shipping, but not ‘pandemic-scale’: analyst | S&P Global https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2026/03/middle-east-war-impacts-container-shipping?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Routing Costs in 2026: The $1 Million Cape Detour | CXTMS https://cxtms.com/blog/2026-04-30-red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-routing-costs-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news-red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai • TPM26: War a problem for container shipping, but not ‘pandemic-scale’: analyst | S&P Global https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2026/03/middle-east-war-impacts-container-shipping?utm_source=openai • Drewry - Service Expertise - World Container Index - 26 Feb https://www.drewry.co.uk/wci?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Routing Costs in 2026: The $1 Million Cape Detour | CXTMS https://cxtms.com/blog/2026-04-30-red-sea-bab-el-mandeb-routing-costs-2026?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Rerouting Continues to Impact Global Shipping Schedules and Costs in Q1 2026 - Ports Directory https://ports.marinelink.com/ports/port/tacoma/news-red-sea-rerouting-impacts-global-shipping-q1-2026?utm_source=openai)