## Company Profile Strike BE BV — Belgian freight forwarder. Public contact listed at belgium@strike.aero (domain suggests an aviation/air-cargo focus). No public revenue or headcount found in initial search. Likely a small-to-mid sized forwarder operating on Belgium–Europe air cargo corridors (Brussels/Liege catchment) given local presence and the strike.aero domain. ## Pain Points 1) Margin pressure on general cargo as belly capacity recovers: spot and contract rates have eased from 2021–22 peaks, increasing competitive pressure from large multinationals that can shift volumes across hubs (BRU/LGG/AMS/CDG/FRA). 2) Need to protect and grow premium pharma/perishables business: BRU is a pharma hub with specialized handling; Strike may need verified sourcing channels and guaranteed temperature‑controlled capacity to retain high‑yield customers. 3) Episodic capacity shocks and contingency demand from Red Sea disruptions: clients need rapid access to air capacity/sea‑air alternatives and flexible contracting to avoid delays and inventory shortages. ## Intel Summary === MULTI-DIMENSION RESEARCH === === 1. [MARKET EVENTS] Europe air cargo capacity 2026 – belly capacity recovery & air freight rates, with focus on Belgium forwarders === **Capacity & belly recovery in Europe (2025 → early 2026)** - IATA data for full‑year 2025 show global cargo tonne‑kilometres (CTKs) at a record level, with **capacity (ACTKs) up 4.5% year‑on‑year in Dec 2025**, driven largely by the return of passenger wide‑bodies and associated belly capacity. Europe–Asia flows shifted structurally higher in 2025 and into early 2026 as trade moved from Asia–US to Asia–Europe. ([iata.org](https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/2026-01-29-01/?utm_source=openai)) - TIACA and IATA analysis through late‑2024/2025 show **belly share of international capacity back in the mid‑30% range (around 36–37%)**, close to or slightly above pre‑COVID levels, while dedicated freighter growth has flattened. This means the bulk of incremental capacity in 2025–26 is coming from passenger bellies, especially on long‑haul Europe–Asia and Europe–North America routes. ([accenture.com](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/travel/air-cargo-capacity?utm_source=openai)) - Accenture’s cargo‑capacity tracking into early 2025 shows **passenger belly capacity “stable” year‑on‑year** on major intercontinental lanes, with further growth expected into summer 2026 as long‑haul passenger schedules are fully restored. Freighter capacity shows the usual seasonal volatility but without strong growth, so the supply–demand balance is dictated increasingly by passenger schedules rather than all‑cargo operators. ([accenture.com](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/travel/air-cargo-capacity?utm_source=openai)) **Impact on air freight rates into 2026 (Europe focus)** - Global commentary for 2026 describes a market of “slower growth, stronger structural demand” and **no return to ultra‑tight COVID‑era conditions**. Capacity is adequate on many lanes but tight on some Asia–Europe corridors due to trade and routing shifts (including Red Sea–linked mode shifts). ([stattimes.com](https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai)) - The same analysis notes that while cross‑border e‑commerce growth has moderated (especially China–US), **Asia–Europe and intra‑Asia flows remain robust**, keeping average Europe‑related load factors at historically healthy levels. This **tempers the downward pressure on rates** one would otherwise expect from full belly recovery. ([stattimes.com](https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai)) - Forwarders report that 2026 **contract rates on core Europe lanes are below the 2021–22 peak, but still structurally above 2019** due to: - structurally higher fuel and labor costs; - persistent surcharges/war‑risk premiums on some routings; - sticky yield expectations from carriers after several profitable years. Quantitatively, analyst and forwarder commentary suggest **spot‑rate levels at roughly 1.2–1.5× pre‑COVID averages on Asia–Europe**, versus 2–3× at the peak. (This is synthesized from market reports like STAT Times and consultancy briefings, which rarely publish exact €/kg numbers but consistently characterize the differential this way.) ([stattimes.com](https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai)) **Implications for forwarders in Belgium (micro‑angle)** - Belgium is heavily exposed to long‑haul belly capacity through **Brussels (BRU) and Liege (LGG)**, plus trucking to AMS/CDG/DELTA region. Return of wide‑body passenger flying into BRU and neighboring hubs has: - **Improved space availability on general cargo and express/e‑commerce**, reducing the extreme allocation tensions seen in 2021–22. - **Increased competitive pressure on mid‑sized Belgian forwarders**, because multinational forwarders can now play multiple hubs (BRU/LGG/AMS/CDG/FRA) and shift volumes to where belly rates are lowest. - For high‑value/pharma‑heavy flows, however, **Belgian forwarders remain somewhat protected**: - Brussels is a recognized pharma hub, with specialized cool‑chain infrastructure and CEIV‑pharma–certified handlers; this segment is less price‑elastic and continues to command premium yields even as overall belly capacity normalizes. ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passagiers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) - Risks and opportunities for 2026: - **Margin compression on general cargo** as more belly space comes back and large shippers push for 2–3 year rate resets closer to pre‑COVID norms. - **Stable to strong yields on pharma and temperature‑controlled perishables**, especially where shippers require BRU’s specialist handling and regulatory compliance – a key niche for Belgium‑based forwarders. - Ongoing **volatility from Red Sea‑driven ocean disruptions** (see Dimension 3) intermittently tightens air capacity and supports higher rates on specific Asia–Europe flows, creating tactical opportunities for forwarders who can secure block‑space or charter capacity on short notice. ([stattimes.com](https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai)) **Section 1 sources:** ([iata.org](https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/2026-01-29-01/?utm_source=openai)) --- === 2. [DEMAND SIGNALS] Brussels Airport cargo volumes 2026 – pharma, perishables, e‑commerce & Belgium air‑freight demand === **Overall cargo volumes & recent trajectory** - Brussels Airport official statistics show **strong cargo growth in 2025**: total cargo handled reached **~795,000 tonnes**, an **+8.5% increase vs 2024**. Flown cargo (on freighters + bellies) grew, while trucked cargo declined. Freighter volumes were up **0.8%**, indicating most incremental volume was in integrator and belly capacity and/or higher load factors. ([caasint.com](https://caasint.com/brussels-airport-cargo-volumes-rise-strongly-in-2025/?utm_source=openai)) - The airport press release notes that in **December 2025 cargo volumes fell 6.6% year‑on‑year to 65,000 tonnes**, pointing to some cooling after the strong annual performance, likely linked to macroeconomic softness in Europe and some normalization after Red Sea‑related spikes. ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passagiers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) - Monthly‑traffic pages for 2026 have been posted but only partial months are visible; early‑2026 data indicate **cargo volumes roughly flat to slightly down year‑on‑year**, consistent with a plateau after the 2025 growth spurt. (The monthly figures page lists 2026 tonnages by month; the pattern shows single‑digit +/- movements rather than large swings.) ([brusselsairport.be](https://www.brusselsairport.be/en/our-airport/facts-figures/monthly-traffic-figures?utm_source=openai)) **Segment mix: pharma, perishables, e‑commerce (structural demand)** - Brussels Airport’s own communications clearly position BRU as a **specialized cargo platform for pharmaceuticals, perishables, e‑commerce and live animals**. In the 2025 annual passenger/cargo press release, the airport explicitly states that it “offers a leading cargo platform specializing in the transport of pharmaceutical products, perishable goods, e‑commerce and live animals.” ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passagiers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) - Pharma: - BRU is one of Europe’s top pharma hubs, with a long‑standing community (Brussels Airport Pharma Hub) and extensive CEIV‑pharma certification among handlers and airlines. While the airport no longer publishes a precise pharma‑share percentage in the latest press note, earlier years indicated **pharma made up well over 20% of flown cargo by value**. That share is likely stable or higher given ongoing growth in biologics and temperature‑sensitive shipments. (This is an informed inference based on historical BRU positioning and continued investment in cool‑chain infrastructure.) - Perishables: - The airport explicitly highlights perishables as a strategic segment; Belgian trade in fresh produce, flowers and high‑value foods (seafood, chocolates, specialty foods) continues to support this lane mix. Growth is moderate but resilient, tracking European HORECA and retail trends. ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) - E‑commerce: - BRU is increasingly exposed to cross‑border e‑commerce flows, mainly from **Asia into Europe**, including parcel networks and express players. While 2025 global data suggest **slower growth in China‑US e‑commerce**, Asia–Europe lanes remain robust, supporting integrator and postal volumes through BRU. ([stattimes.com](https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai)) **Belgium air‑freight demand context (beyond BRU)** - Belgium’s air‑freight demand is also channeled via **Liege (LGG)** for express and e‑commerce (not captured in BRU stats), plus significant **trucked cargo to major hubs** such as AMS, FRA and CDG. The decline in “trucked cargo” at BRU in 2025 (**–6.7%**) suggests some cargo is being moved directly to other hubs or switched to alternative modes, even as flown cargo through BRU grows. ([caasint.com](https://caasint.com/brussels-airport-cargo-volumes-rise-strongly-in-2025/?utm_source=openai)) - IATA’s broader 2025 data show a **shift of global air‑cargo flows toward Asia–Europe**, helped by tariff changes and the removal of the US de‑minimis exemption. This favors European gateways – including BRU – for high‑value export/import flows (electronics, pharma, fashion, time‑critical spares). ([iata.org](https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/2026-01-29-01/?utm_source=openai)) **Forward‑looking signals for 2026 demand at BRU** - Passenger volumes at BRU in 2025 reached **24.4 million (+3.3% vs 2024)** and continue to grow in 2026, which should **gradually increase belly capacity** and support cargo options, especially on long‑haul routes added or expanded in 2025 (e.g., Cathay Pacific, Air Senegal, Smartwings). More long‑haul routes improve network connectivity for Belgian shippers and forwarders. ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) - However, the December 2025 dip and early‑2026 flatness point to a **more mature, less explosive growth phase**: - General cargo and some e‑commerce volumes are sensitive to European consumer demand, which remains soft. - Pharma and other GDP‑linked high‑value cargo (including clinical trial materials, biotech inputs) provide a **relatively inelastic base of demand** that cushions downside risk. ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) **Key quantitative takeaways for BRU (latest available):** - **795,000 t total cargo in 2025, +8.5% vs 2024**. ([caasint.com](https://caasint.com/brussels-airport-cargo-volumes-rise-strongly-in-2025/?utm_source=openai)) - **Freighter (all‑cargo aircraft) volumes +0.8% in 2025**, integrator/belly and specialized flows driving most growth. ([caasint.com](https://caasint.com/brussels-airport-cargo-volumes-rise-strongly-in-2025/?utm_source=openai)) - **Trucked cargo –6.7% in 2025**, signaling some consolidation or re‑routing. ([caasint.com](https://caasint.com/brussels-airport-cargo-volumes-rise-strongly-in-2025/?utm_source=openai)) - **December 2025 cargo 65,000 t, –6.6% y/y**, indicating some late‑year softening. ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) **Section 2 sources:** ([brusselsairport.be](https://www.brusselsairport.be/en/our-airport/facts-figures/monthly-traffic-figures?utm_source=openai)) --- === 3. [PROBLEM FRAMING] Red Sea security (2023–2026) – impact on Asia–Europe freight routes & diversion effect on air‑cargo demand in 2026 === **Timeline & severity of the Red Sea crisis (2023–2026)** - Hostilities began in **October 2023**, when Yemen’s Houthi movement started attacking commercial vessels in the Bab‑el‑Mandeb / southern Red Sea region. This has been widely described as a “new Suez Crisis.” ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea_crisis?utm_source=openai)) - From **December 2023**, major container lines (Maersk, MSC, etc.) began diverting ships around the Cape of Good Hope. Early estimates suggest **70–75% of Asia–Europe container vessels were rerouted**, cutting effective capacity by **~15–20%** on those lanes and adding **10–14 days** transit time plus **USD 1.5–2.5 million** in extra voyage costs per trip. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) - UNCTAD and other analyses report that from **Dec 2023 to Feb 2024**, spot rates on Shanghai–Europe container lanes rose by about **+256%**, with some market indices indicating **up to ~461% increases vs mid‑October 2023** on Asia–Northern Europe lanes. ([freightos.com](https://www.freightos.com/freight-blog/market-update/red-sea-crisis-impact/?utm_source=openai)) - Suez Canal throughput fell sharply: container transits in **Nov 2024 were down ~72% year‑on‑year (115 vs 422 vessels)**. By early 2025, **container vessel traffic through Suez was still about 75% below 2023 levels**, indicating prolonged disruption. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) **Asia–Europe freight routing impacts (ocean)** - Diversions around the Cape absorb capacity and increase sailing time and fuel burn (one academic routing study estimates **~40% higher CO₂ emissions per Asia–Europe voyage** via Cape vs Suez, with faster steaming adding another ~14% on top). ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea?utm_source=openai)) - Market‑intelligence pieces from 2024–25 consistently describe: - Elevated but volatile rates; - **Longer lead‑times (10–14 days)**; - Equipment imbalances and schedule disruptions into North Europe and the Med; - Some carriers experimenting with partial or phased return to Suez as security conditions allow, but with a **“risk premium” baked into pricing and routing choices**. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) **Diversion effect on air‑cargo demand (2024–2026)** Mechanisms that link Red Sea disruption to air‑freight demand on Asia–Europe: 1. **Mode shift for time‑sensitive cargo** - When container lead times extend by two weeks and reliability drops, **shippers with high‑value, time‑critical goods (electronics, fashion, pharma, auto spares) partially switch to air** – either for entire flows or as a “gap‑filler” to keep production lines and retail shelves stocked. - Trade/consulting reports note spikes in **air‑freight inquiries and spot charters** during late‑2023 and early‑2024, similar in nature (though smaller in scale) to the COVID‑era air‑cargo surges following ocean disruptions. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) 2. **Inventory and network strategy changes** - Some analyses advise European importers to **pre‑position 45–75 days of inventory** in Europe instead of relying solely on ocean just‑in‑time flows. This can initially **increase air‑freight demand** as companies accelerate shipments to build inventory buffers. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) 3. **Price differential vs ocean** - Ocean‑rate spikes of 2.5–4.5× baseline narrow the **relative cost penalty of air freight** for high‑value/low‑density goods. For some products, the margin impact of late delivery outweighs the additional air‑freight cost, making temporary mode shift economically rational. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) **Observed and inferred impacts on 2026 Asia–Europe air‑cargo demand** - IATA’s 2025 data show **record global CTKs and a shift of flows toward Asia–Europe**, consistent with some structural reallocation of air‑cargo demand toward Europe, partly linked to trade policy and partly to routing/security issues on sea lanes. ([iata.org](https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/2026-01-29-01/?utm_source=openai)) - Market commentary into 2026 characterizes air cargo as **“normalizing at higher volumes”**: growth rates are modest, but the base level of demand is above pre‑COVID. The Red Sea disruptions are cited as one factor sustaining demand on Asia–Europe lanes, particularly for time‑sensitive and high‑value cargo. ([stattimes.com](https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai)) - However, several constraints moderate how large this diversion effect can be in 2026: - **Belly capacity has largely returned**, and overall capacity is not as tight as in 2020–21, so **rate spikes are more contained** and carriers can absorb some incremental demand without extreme congestion. ([accenture.com](https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/travel/air-cargo-capacity?utm_source=openai)) - Many shippers have now **re‑optimized supply chains** (multi‑sourcing, near‑shoring, more inventory). This reduces the need for emergency air‑freight compared to the initial shock phase of 2023–24. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) **Specific implications for 2026 air‑cargo demand into Europe and Belgium** - For European gateways (including BRU and nearby hubs used by Belgian forwarders), the Red Sea crisis likely contributes to: - **A persistent “premium” layer of demand** from sectors that now treat air freight as part of normal contingency planning (e.g., critical components, pharmaceuticals, some fast‑fashion, and high‑margin consumer electronics). - ** episodic surges in air‑freight demand** whenever Red Sea security incidents flare up, ocean schedules slip, or carriers pull back from Suez again. - For Belgium specifically: - Pharma and other life‑science flows transiting **Brussels’ specialized pharma platform** are particularly sensitive to lead‑time and temperature‑risk; some of this cargo, which might previously have tolerated reefer‑container sea transit via Suez, is more likely to use air routinely or opportunistically in the current risk environment. ([pressroom.brusselsairport.be](https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai)) - Belgian forwarders can capture value by: - Offering **integrated sea–air solutions** (Asia → Gulf by sea, then air to Europe), mitigating both cost and risk; - Structuring **flexible contracts** that allow shippers to switch between ocean and air (or express) depending on Red Sea security status and relative rate spreads. **Problem framing (for strategy):** - The Red Sea crisis from **late‑2023 through at least early‑2025** has moved from an acute shock to a **chronic, partially priced‑in risk**. - For Asia–Europe flows in 2026, the key dynamic is **not a one‑time surge** but a **structurally higher probability of disruption**, leading to: - a **higher baseline for air‑cargo demand** than in a “stable Suez” scenario; - greater volatility in both ocean and air rates; - increased value of **resilience, multi‑modal options, and rapid capacity access** for forwarders and shippers. **Section 3 sources:** ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai)) Sources: • IATA - Global Air Cargo Demand Achieved Record Volume in 2025 https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/2026-01-29-01/?utm_source=openai • Current State of Global Air Cargo Industry Capacity | Accenture https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/travel/air-cargo-capacity?utm_source=openai • Current State of Global Air Cargo Industry Capacity | Accenture https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/travel/air-cargo-capacity?utm_source=openai • Global air freight in 2026: Slower growth, stronger structural demand https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai • Global air freight in 2026: Slower growth, stronger structural demand https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai • Global air freight in 2026: Slower growth, stronger structural demand https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai • 24,4 miljoen passagiers op Brussels Airport in 2025, 3,3% meer dan in 2024 https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai • Global air freight in 2026: Slower growth, stronger structural demand https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai • IATA - Global Air Cargo Demand Achieved Record Volume in 2025 https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/2026-01-29-01/?utm_source=openai • 24,4 miljoen passagiers op Brussels Airport in 2025, 3,3% meer dan in 2024 https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai • Monthly air traffic figures | Brussels Airport https://www.brusselsairport.be/en/our-airport/facts-figures/monthly-traffic-figures?utm_source=openai • 24,4 miljoen passagiers op Brussels Airport in 2025, 3,3% meer dan in 2024 https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai • 24,4 miljoen passagiers op Brussels Airport in 2025, 3,3% meer dan in 2024 https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai • Brussels Airport cargo volumes rise strongly in 2025 https://caasint.com/brussels-airport-cargo-volumes-rise-strongly-in-2025/?utm_source=openai • 24,4 miljoen passagiers op Brussels Airport in 2025, 3,3% meer dan in 2024 https://pressroom.brusselsairport.be/244-miljoen-passengers-op-brussels-airport-in-2025-33-meer-dan-in-2024?utm_source=openai • Red Sea crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea_crisis?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis - Alternative Routes & Cost Analysis 2025 https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai • Impact of Red Sea Crisis | Freightos https://www.freightos.com/freight-blog/market-update/red-sea-crisis-impact/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis - Alternative Routes & Cost Analysis 2025 https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis - Alternative Routes & Cost Analysis 2025 https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis - Alternative Routes & Cost Analysis 2025 https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis - Alternative Routes & Cost Analysis 2025 https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai • IATA - Global Air Cargo Demand Achieved Record Volume in 2025 https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/2026-01-29-01/?utm_source=openai • Global air freight in 2026: Slower growth, stronger structural demand https://www.stattimes.com/air-cargo/global-air-freight-in-2026-slower-growth-stronger-structural-demand-1357860?utm_source=openai • Current State of Global Air Cargo Industry Capacity | Accenture https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/travel/air-cargo-capacity?utm_source=openai • Red Sea Shipping Crisis - Alternative Routes & Cost Analysis 2025 https://content.ballastmarkets.com/learn/modules/red-sea-alternative-routes/?utm_source=openai