Research Intel
Hook Candidates
1) Red Sea / routing disruption → Europe: With late‑2025/early‑2026 Red Sea diversions and longer transit times to Europe, Pakistan exporters are facing rising spot sea rates and schedule unreliability. ABSCargo’s customers (textiles, home‑textiles, urgent garment shipments) need alternative delivery channels and proactive booking/route optimization now. Tridge Ark can be pitched as a delivery channel that guarantees multi‑modal routing options, market match‑making, and hands‑on orchestration for SMEs that ABSCargo currently serves.
2) Mango & perishables peak (May–July 2026) + Ramadan spikes: Air and reefer capacity to GCC and EU tightens in late Q1 and in the mango season. Local exporters need guaranteed cold‑chain capacity, documentation handling, and access to buyers. ABSCargo can originate perishables exporters into Tridge Ark so Tridge handles buyer sourcing, quality checks, and end‑to‑end logistics delivery — reducing rate and space risk for ABSCargo’s SME clients and creating new revenue flows for the forwarder.
## Company Profile
Al Barsha Star Cargo Services — freight forwarder (Pakistan). Public lead data: website http://www.abscargo.net and contact Sami-ul-Haq (email: sami.dxb@abscargo.net). Likely SME/medium-sized forwarder offering air and sea freight forwarding, customs clearance, export documentation, and consolidated services for Pakistani exporters (textiles, agri-produce, seafood) to Gulf (UAE, KSA) and Europe. Appears to operate on Pakistan–GCC and Pakistan–Europe corridors (email domain suggests GCC/Dubai connections). Scale is not publicly stated; treat as a local forwarder/agent with regional broker relationships rather than a large global NVOCC.
## Pain Points
1) Capacity & rate volatility for ABSCargo’s clients in immediate windows (Ramadan in Q1 and mango season May–July 2026): tight air/reefer space and rising sea spot rates to Europe due to Red Sea diversions leave SME shippers exposed to roll‑overs and margin squeeze.
2) Persistent operational friction despite PSW: SMEs and smaller forwarders still face documentation, inspection, and port‑community bottlenecks that cause unpredictable delays and extra cost — especially for perishable and high‑value textile shipments.
3) Limited buyer‑market access and trade intelligence for SMEs: Exporters need help diversifying destinations and finding reliable buyers; ABSCargo lacks a turnkey channel to offer end‑to‑end buyer matchmaking, quality control and payment terms assurance to their SME customers.
## Intel Summary
=== MULTI-DIMENSION RESEARCH ===
=== 1. [MARKET EVENTS] – Pakistan export/import flows & port dynamics (latest, as of H1‑FY2025‑26 / early 2026) ===
**Overall trade balance and growth (FY2025‑26)**
- Pakistan’s goods exports in the first half of FY2025‑26 (July–December 2025) reached **PKR 4.27 trillion**, **down 7.78% YoY** from PKR 4.63 trillion in 1H‑FY2024‑25. Imports in the same period were **PKR 9.72 trillion**, **up 13.12% YoY** from PKR 8.60 trillion, widening the trade deficit in nominal PKR terms. ([profit.pakistantoday.com.pk](https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2026/01/21/pakistan-earns-rs-4-27-trillion-from-goods-exports-in-first-half-of-fy26/?utm_source=openai))
- Monthly: December 2025 exports were **PKR 635.0 billion**, down 6.41% from PKR 679.6 billion in November 2025, indicating softening external demand or shipping constraints heading into 2026. ([profit.pakistantoday.com.pk](https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2026/01/21/pakistan-earns-rs-4-27-trillion-from-goods-exports-in-first-half-of-fy26/?utm_source=openai))
**Major export commodities – recent shifts**
(Recent detailed commodity‑level stats by HS are behind paywalls; below uses latest public summaries and known structure.)
- According to an updated 2025 breakdown, **textiles and apparel** still dominate, with top export categories: knitwear, woven garments, bed linen/home textiles, and rice. Combined, textiles‑related categories account for well over **50% of merchandise export earnings**. ([worldstopexports.com](https://www.worldstopexports.com/pakistans-top-10-exports/?utm_source=openai))
- A 2025 export composition snapshot shows:
- **Textiles and clothing** (garments, knitwear, bed linen, yarn, fabrics) remain the largest cluster;
- **Cereals (primarily rice)** showed a **−43.6% YoY drop** among top export categories in the latest year‑on‑year comparison, reflecting both price and volume pressures; ([worldstopexports.com](https://www.worldstopexports.com/pakistans-top-10-exports/?utm_source=openai))
- **Leather goods, surgical instruments, sports goods**, and **chemicals/pharmaceuticals** form secondary export pillars with smaller but stable shares. ([worldstopexports.com](https://www.worldstopexports.com/pakistans-top-10-exports/?utm_source=openai))
**Top export corridors / destinations (with emphasis on Middle East, EU, China)**
- For **1H‑FY2025‑26 (Jul–Dec 2025)**, top export destinations by value:
- **United States** – **US$3.14 billion**, remaining the largest single‐country market.
- **China** – **US$1.46 billion**, now the second‑largest market.
- **United Kingdom** – **US$1.10 billion**. ([dailytimes.com.pk](https://dailytimes.com.pk/1439978/us-china-and-uk-top-3-destinations-of-pakistani-exports-in-1hfy2026/?utm_source=openai))
- The same dataset confirms that the **UAE and Saudi Arabia** remain key Middle East partners though not top‑3 globally: earlier SBP data for Q1‑FY2025‑26 showed exports to UAE at **US$491.6m** (down from US$564.7m YoY), while shipments to Germany (EU) edged up to **US$445.7m**, indicating relatively firmer EU demand than Gulf in that quarter. ([profit.pakistantoday.com.pk](https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2025/10/23/us-remains-top-destination-for-pakistan-exports-in-first-quarter-of-fy2025-26/?utm_source=openai))
- A recent article summarizing Pakistan–EU trade trends notes that exports to the EU reached **US$8.863 billion in FY2025**, up **7.44%** from US$8.249 billion in the previous fiscal year, underlining Europe as a **stable and slightly growing** market despite EU‑wide consumer softness. Western Europe (Germany, Netherlands, France, Italy, Belgium) remains the core sub‑region. ([pakistantv.com](https://www.pakistantv.com/article/europe-buys-more-from-pakistan-as-export-trend-strengthens?utm_source=openai))
**Import structure and corridors (headline view)**
- Latest macro overview (2024 estimates) continues to show **China, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and other Gulf suppliers** as major origin countries for Pakistan’s imports (energy, machinery, intermediate inputs). China is roughly **one‑quarter of Pakistan’s total imports**; Gulf states collectively supply a large share of **crude and refined fuels**. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Pakistan?utm_source=openai))
- With **1H‑FY2025‑26 imports rising 13.1% YoY**, the composition is shifting back toward **energy and capital goods** as import suppression measures of 2022–23 ease, suggesting stronger domestic demand and/or currency‑adjusted pricing. ([profit.pakistantoday.com.pk](https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2026/01/21/pakistan-earns-rs-4-27-trillion-from-goods-exports-in-first-half-of-fy26/?utm_source=openai))
**Karachi Port – latest traffic and container volumes**
- Karachi remains Pakistan’s primary seaport, with **annual container capacity ~4.25 million TEUs** and **total cargo capacity ~125 million tons**. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/ports/karachi/?utm_source=openai))
- Based on IMF PortWatch‑derived data summarized early 2025, Karachi handled:
- **1,379 vessel calls** (reference year 2024), of which
- **682 were container vessels (49.5%)**,
- **326 tankers (23.6%)**,
- **278 dry bulk carriers (20.2%)**. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/ports/karachi/?utm_source=openai))
- The same source indicates Karachi Port achieved **record container throughput of 2.65 million TEUs in FY2024‑25**, implying around **62% utilization** of its nominal TEU capacity—leaving room for additional flows without large new infrastructure. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/ports/karachi/?utm_source=openai))
- Karachi Gateway Terminal (KGTL), a container terminal operated under a 50‑year concession, ramped up after starting operations in **July 2023**, giving incremental container‑handling capacity and productivity improvements. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Karachi?utm_source=openai))
**Gwadar Port – status and impact (as of 2025–26)**
- Gwadar continues to be strategically important under the **China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)** but still handles a **small fraction** of Pakistan’s containerized trade compared with Karachi/Port Qasim. Current public data emphasize its role in **Afghan transit trade**, bulk cargo, and free‑zone development rather than large‑scale container flows. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwadar_Port?utm_source=openai))
- Gwadar was operationalized for **Afghan transit trade on 14 January 2020**, and CPEC investments focus on linking Gwadar to inland markets via road/rail and on free‑zone development. The **New Gwadar International Airport**, where the first Airbus A319 test flight landed in **January 2025**, is a key enabler for future cargo and investment inflows but is still in ramp‑up, not yet a major cargo hub. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Gwadar_International_Airport?utm_source=openai))
- Net impact to date (2024–early 2026):
- **Marginal direct effect on Pakistan’s national export volumes** (most export TEUs still move via Karachi/Port Qasim).
- **Strategic diversification** benefit by offering an alternative deep‑sea port and potential shorter route for Western China/Central Asia once road and rail links fully operationalize.
- **Sectoral signal**: Free‑zone marketing focuses on seafood processing, logistics, and light manufacturing, but actual large‑scale export manufacturing volumes are still limited per open data. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwadar_Port?utm_source=openai))
**Key takeaways for 2026 market‑events framing**
- Pakistan enters calendar 2026 with:
- A **widening trade deficit in PKR terms** driven by faster growth in imports than exports;
- Textiles and EU/US corridors still anchoring export earnings, with China and the Gulf (particularly UAE, Saudi Arabia) important but more volatile;
- **Karachi Port** operating comfortably below full capacity but achieving record TEU throughput in FY2024‑25;
- **Gwadar** still mainly a strategic and future‑capacity story rather than a current major export gateway.
**Sources – Market Events**: ([profit.pakistantoday.com.pk](https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2026/01/21/pakistan-earns-rs-4-27-trillion-from-goods-exports-in-first-half-of-fy26/?utm_source=openai))
=== 2. [DEMAND SIGNALS] – Air & sea freight rates, capacity constraints, perishables/textiles seasonality (Q1–Q2 2026) ===
Direct, lane‑specific spot rate data for Pakistan‑origin corridors is mostly behind paywalls (Xeneta, Freightos, Drewry, TAC Index, etc.). Public‑domain information plus regional proxies provide directional signals.
**Sea freight – Pakistan to Middle East & Europe (Q1–Q2 2026)**
- Container shipping indices show that Asia–Europe spot rates increased again in late 2025 and early 2026 due to **Red Sea diversions** and geopolitical risk, with carriers rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope. This pushed **Asia–North Europe and Asia–Mediterranean rates to 2–3x mid‑2023 lows**, with South Asia (including Pakistan) affected similarly. ([qnb.com](https://qnb.com/sites/qnb/qnbfs/document/ar/arDMR08October2025?utm_source=openai))
- For Pakistan specifically, forwarder advisories in early 2026 (public summaries) indicate:
- **Karachi/Port Qasim – Jebel Ali/Dubai & Dammam**:
- Short‑haul GCC corridor; base ocean freight for a 40’ container in Q1‑2026 is commonly reported in the **low‑ to mid‑US$500–800/FEU range**, excluding surcharges, but with **peak season and war risk surcharges** sometimes adding US$100–200/box when services are indirectly affected by regional security premiums. (Figure inferred from regional South Asia–Gulf quotes and open‑source rate benchmarks.)
- **Karachi – North Europe (e.g., Rotterdam, Hamburg)**:
- Post‑Red‑Sea‑disruption, spot rates have reportedly risen to approximately **US$2,000–3,000/FEU** on some South Asia–North Europe lanes compared with sub‑US$1,500 levels in 2023. Pakistan shippers face similar banded levels, especially for textiles exporters needing scheduled services.
- Capacity:
- No structural shortage of vessel capacity out of Karachi, but **schedule reliability and transit times** have deteriorated for Europe‑bound cargo due to diversions, with typical 25–30‑day transits stretching by **7–10 days** in some instances.
- Gulf lanes (to UAE/Saudi) remain well served via regional feeders and mainline calls; capacity constraints here are more about **equipment positioning (reefers, special equipment)** than berth space. ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/ports/karachi/?utm_source=openai))
**Air freight – Pakistan to UAE, Saudi Arabia, Europe (Q1–Q2 2026)**
(Precise corridor‑level US$/kg data are mostly proprietary; below is directional information.)
- Regional air cargo indices show **rising yields out of South Asia to Middle East and Europe** in late 2025 and early 2026 driven by:
- The **shift of high‑value and urgent goods from sea to air** due to Suez/Red Sea risk and extended sea transit times;
- Seasonal peaks for **mango exports, fresh seafood, and high‑value textiles/fashion samples**.
- Pakistan origin:
- **Perishables (mangoes, fresh vegetables, seafood)** rely heavily on belly capacity on flights to GCC and on dedicated freighters in peak season. Airlines serving Pakistan–GCC (Emirates, Qatar Airways, Saudia, Etihad, FlyDubai, Air Arabia, Pakistan International Airlines and others) collectively provide a relatively dense **cargo network to UAE/Saudi hubs**. This often leads to competitive but volatile spot rates in **US$1.5–3.0/kg** band for general cargo in normal season, with **perishables and special handling surcharges** increasing the effective rate in peak export windows.
- To **Europe**, air cargo capacity is more limited; exporters often trans‑ship via Dubai/Doha/Abu Dhabi. Indirect routings add cost and transit time, and **rate spikes above US$3–4/kg** are common during high‑demand windows (e.g., pre‑Ramadan shipments, fashion cycles, urgent replenishment for EU retailers).
**Seasonality – mangoes, seafood, textiles (2026)**
- **Mango exports:**
- Pakistan’s mango season typically runs **May–September**, with **peak export shipments June–August**. This pattern is stable year‑to‑year. Exporters increasingly use **air freight for premium varieties (Sindhri, Chaunsa)** targeting UAE, Saudi, Qatar, and the UK/EU ethnic retail channels, while sea‑freight (reefers) is used for volume shipments.
- Air cargo demand to **UAE/Saudi** thus spikes in **late Q2 and early Q3 (May–July 2026)**, tightening cold‑chain capacity and pushing up per‑kg rates and space guarantees.
- **Seafood:**
- Pakistan’s marine exports (fish, shrimp, cuttlefish) see stronger demand in **winter–spring** for certain species aligned with Islamic calendar peaks (Ramadan, Hajj) in GCC markets, and with year‑end frozen demand in EU/China. This drives **reefer container and air‑freight demand in Q1–Q2** when Ramadan falls in these quarters (in 2026, Ramadan is expected around **late‑Feb to late‑Mar 2026**), encouraging front‑loaded shipments to Gulf.
- **Textiles and apparel:**
- Core European and US buying seasons mean Pakistan’s **textile export production peaks several months ahead of Western retail seasons**. Yarn and fabric shipments to regional converters are steadier, but **ready‑made garment exports** show:
- A **Q4–Q1 peak** aligned with orders for spring/summer collections;
- A **Q2–Q3 peak** for autumn/winter orders.
- This results in noticeable **container demand swings at Karachi and Port Qasim**, with mainline capacity to Europe and US often tight in **Jan–Mar and Jul–Sep**, and some high‑value/urgent textile shipments spilling into **air cargo** to meet retailer delivery windows.
**Capacity constraints / demand signals summary for Q1–Q2 2026**
- **Sea freight:**
- Main challenge is **disrupted routing and longer transit times to Europe**, rather than absolute lack of capacity.
- GCC lanes remain structurally well served, but reefer equipment for perishables can be tight around mango/seafood peaks.
- **Air freight:**
- Expect **tight belly capacity and higher spot rates** on Pakistan–UAE/Saudi lanes in **Feb–Mar 2026 (Ramadan‑related food/textile inventory build)** and again **May–July 2026 (mango season)**.
- For Europe‑bound air cargo, **indirect routings via Gulf hubs** and global cross‑trade dynamics mean volatility and premium pricing, especially for SME shippers lacking long‑term block‑space agreements.
*(Because most lane‑specific rate data is proprietary, numeric ranges above are inferred from public global indices and regional market commentary rather than Pakistan‑only official statistics.)*
**Sources – Demand Signals**: ([content.ballastmarkets.com](https://content.ballastmarkets.com/ports/karachi/?utm_source=openai))
=== 3. [PROBLEM FRAMING] – Logistics & customs pain points for Pakistani SME exporters (2025–2026) ===
**Core logistics/customs pain points for SMEs (as identified by PSW and policy docs)**
A recent official Pakistan Single Window (PSW) article (April 2026) explicitly lists key challenges faced by exporters, especially **SMEs**, before and during digitization:
1. **Fragmented approvals and excessive documentation**
- Exporters historically had to obtain approvals from **multiple OGAs** (Customs, Plant Protection, Animal Quarantine, Health, Commerce, etc.), each with separate physical offices and manual processes. ([psw.gov.pk](https://psw.gov.pk/knowledge-base/major-export-challenges-pakistan-and-how-digitalization-driving-efficiency-across-trade?utm_source=openai))
- This led to **duplicated data entry**, paper‑based documentation, and high transaction costs for smaller firms lacking dedicated compliance staff.
2. **Costs and time delays in customs clearance**
- Before PSW, exporters often faced **days of delay** from document errors, manual verifications, and repeated physical visits.
- PSW’s own impact narrative indicates that, post‑implementation, traders can save **up to 50–60% of time and 30–40% of processing costs** for certain procedures due to automated data sharing, although exact quantified averages vary by agency and transaction type. ([psw.gov.pk](https://psw.gov.pk/knowledge-base/major-export-challenges-pakistan-and-how-digitalization-driving-efficiency-across-trade?utm_source=openai))
3. **Limited access to real‑time regulatory information**
- SMEs in particular struggle with staying updated on **changing SROs, tariff lines, export rebates, SPS requirements, and destination‑country regulations**. PSW’s trade information portal aims to centralize this, but adoption and awareness gaps remain. ([psw.gov.pk](https://www.psw.gov.pk/?trk=public_post_share-update_update-text&utm_source=openai))
4. **Physical inspection and port‑community bottlenecks**
- Trade facilitation reforms recognized that digital customs alone is insufficient; bottlenecks at **ports and terminals** (gate congestion, manual gate‑in/out processes, siloed port community systems) still impose delays and unreliability on SMEs.
- In 2025 the PSW Governing Council decided that the **Port Community System and Maritime Single Window** would apply to OGAs effective **1 July 2025**, to integrate port actors and reduce port‑side friction. ([pcs.gov.pk](https://www.pcs.gov.pk/news-detail/pakistan-single-window-links-port-community-system-govt-agencies?utm_source=openai))
**Trade facilitation & digitization initiatives (2025–26)**
- **Pakistan Single Window (PSW)**
- Legal basis: **Pakistan Single Window Act 2021**, designating Pakistan Customs as lead agency under WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement commitments. ([dra.gov.pk](https://dra.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/document2.pdf?utm_source=openai))
- Coverage: As of **April 9, 2026**, PSW reports **over 99,000 registered users**, and integration with **23 government institutions** (Customs plus OGAs) on a single digital platform. ([psw.gov.pk](https://psw.gov.pk/knowledge-base/major-export-challenges-pakistan-and-how-digitalization-driving-efficiency-across-trade?utm_source=openai))
- Functional scope:
- **Electronic submission** of declarations and permits;
- **Inter‑agency data sharing**, reducing re‑keying;
- Digital payments;
- A **PSW fee waiver on export declarations** (announced 2025, funded via Export Development Fund) to lower costs for exporters, particularly SMEs. ([psw.gov.pk](https://psw.gov.pk/?trk=public_post_share-update_update-text&utm_source=openai))
- Expected benefits:
- Reduced clearance time;
- Greater predictability;
- Lower compliance cost and reduced informal intermediation (clearing agents, “speed payments”).
- **PortVerse / Port Community System**
- The government announced **“PortVerse”**, a maritime digital system to be launched by the Prime Minister in August (announced 2025), intended to enhance port efficiency by linking terminals, shipping lines, and government agencies. ([psw.gov.pk](https://www.psw.gov.pk/?trk=public_post_share-update_update-text&utm_source=openai))
- Once fully implemented, it should mitigate **gate congestion, manual documentation exchanges**, and poor visibility for SME exporters on vessel cut‑offs and container status.
- **SME‑focused support (PSW “SMElevate”)**
- PSW highlights an **SMElevate** program aimed at strengthening SME export readiness, including training on digital documentation, HS classification, and use of the PSW portal—responding to capability gaps that often prevent SMEs from fully benefiting from trade facilitation tools. ([psw.gov.pk](https://www.psw.gov.pk/?trk=public_post_share-update_update-text&utm_source=openai))
**Origin diversification and market‑risk concerns**
- Heavy reliance on **a few commodity groups (textiles, rice)** and **a limited set of markets (US, EU, China, GCC)** exposes SME exporters to demand, compliance, and preference‑erosion risks (e.g., EU GSP+ status debates, US retail demand cycles). Policy commentary stresses the need to:
- Diversify into **higher‑value agro‑foods** (processed fruits and vegetables, halal meat, seafood value‑added products),
- Target **non‑traditional destinations** in East Asia, Africa, and intra‑regional trade. ([pakistantv.com](https://www.pakistantv.com/article/europe-buys-more-from-pakistan-as-export-trend-strengthens?utm_source=openai))
- However, origin‑country logistics challenges (cold‑chain gaps, certification bottlenecks, limited intermodal connectivity beyond Karachi/Lahore) constrain SMEs’ ability to scale diversified product lines.
**Trade finance & letters of credit (LC) challenges (context up to 2025–26)**
- Pakistan has faced **FX liquidity constraints and tight import controls** in 2022–23, which spilled over into 2024–25 as banks became more cautious in opening LCs, especially for smaller clients. Public sector and media reports (2023–24) documented:
- Delays and refusals to open import LCs for essential inputs;
- High margins and collateral requirements, impacting SMEs’ working capital cycles.
- For exporters, the main issues are:
- **Long payment cycles** and **limited access to pre‑ and post‑shipment finance**;
- Banks’ reluctance to extend lines to smaller or newer exporters without strong collateral or long histories.
- While 2024–25 IMF‑supported stabilization reduced some FX pressures, SME exporters in 2025–26 continue to report:
- High **financing costs** due to elevated domestic interest rates;
- Exposure to **counterparty risk** when buyers insist on open account terms rather than LCs;
- Procedural hurdles in discounting export bills and accessing export‑refinance schemes. (These are synthesized from multiple financial sector and media reports through 2024–25.)
**How these issues manifest operationally for a typical SME exporter in 2026**
- **Pre‑shipment:** Difficulty obtaining affordable working capital and LCs for imported inputs (yarn, packaging, chemicals) lengthens production cycles.
- **Documentation:** Though PSW reduces paperwork, SMEs must still navigate complex **SPS, quality, and destination‑specific requirements**; errors can trigger holds.
- **Customs & ports:** If PSW/PortVerse integrations are not fully utilized (e.g., by smaller clearing agents), shipments can still face **unpredictable delays** at Karachi/Port Qasim due to inspections, container handling, and manual processes in certain agencies.
- **Logistics:** Volatile ocean and air freight rates, plus limited bargaining power with carriers/forwarders, leave SMEs exposed to **last‑minute rate hikes** and space roll‑overs in peak seasons (mango, textiles).
- **Market risk:** Concentration in a few destination markets increases vulnerability to **policy shocks (e.g., EU preference changes)** or macro downturns, which can quickly translate into order cuts for Pakistani SMEs.
**Sources – Problem Framing**: ([psw.gov.pk](https://psw.gov.pk/knowledge-base/major-export-challenges-pakistan-and-how-digitalization-driving-efficiency-across-trade?utm_source=openai))
If you’d like, I can next translate this into a one‑page opportunity/risk brief for a specific commodity (e.g., mangoes, seafood, or textiles) or for a logistics service provider looking at Pakistan–GCC/EU lanes.